Editor’s letter
Tech versus bricks & mortar

With technology making it ever simpler for consumers to personalise the products they buy, operators will increasingly turn to tech rather than bricks and mortar to deliver individually curated fitness experiences

By Kate Cracknell | Published in Health Club Management 2016 issue 10


B usinesses don’t get to tell consumers what to buy any more. This was the stark warning from Humphrey Cobbold, CEO of Pure Gym, during the Millennial-focused panel session I moderated at Bloomberg’s e-wellness and technology conference recently.

He continued: “We have to maximise the number of options we’re offering, and then give people the flexibility to buy exactly the product they want – and none of the things they don’t. Mobile devices have put the power into the hands of the consumer.”

All around the room were nods of agreement: flexibility is one of the main boxes that businesses must tick if they want to appeal to Millennials. Indeed, new Danish health club brand Repeat (page 38), designed specifically for Millennials, has built its entire pricing model around this insight. Memberships are sold on a weekly basis – pay per visit is also available – and can be cancelled through the app with just that week plus one more week’s notice.

But this sort of flexibility doesn’t only appeal to Millennials – most customers would love to create their perfect package and then pay only for that. What better way to feel you’re getting good value?

Pure Gym has recognised this and is now investing heavily in technology to better cater for all its members, earmarking a significant proportion of the £190m it plans to generate from this month’s stock market flotation for precisely this purpose. Specifically, Cobbold says his in-house tech team will be developing systems to deliver new and distinct membership packages, “in much the same way an airline creates different price points for different seats on the same flight”.

Offering different levels of membership in itself isn’t new, but the sheer level of personalisation now possible thanks to technology means consumers expect to have a dynamic relationship with the businesses they use. They want to be in charge on a day-to-day basis, controlling things from the palm of their hand. And as Cobbold says, technology delivers this, allowing people to “make choices about how they want to use the gym – what sort of membership they want and how they want to pay for it”.

Using technology to personalise the experience allows operators to very cost-effectively experiment with marketing to the various shared-interest ‘tribes’ that exist among fitness users. As Pure Gym has already shown with its trial of premium memberships, it’s comparatively risk-free to test new ideas in a handful of locations before rolling out across the estate at the touch of a button.

This in contrast to the bricks and mortar approach we’ve seen so far; although the tribalisation of fitness has accelerated recently, it’s primarily been through the launch of Millennial-focused facilities such as CrossFit and the boutiques, all building strong tribes around their niche offerings. This approach requires significant investment, not to mention creating a long-term property liability with less flexibility to adapt to new trends.

No doubt these specialist clubs will continue to thrive, but we’re seeing the emergence of a digital alternative – a way to use technology to unbundle a full-service offering and deliver curated, personalised experiences for each and every member within one facility.

Creating points of difference won’t be as straightforward as when building a dedicated facility, because members will still be choosing from the same menu of services and facilities. But if marketed well, tribes will naturally form; additional income from new (and more satisfied) users can be invested in improvements and new services; and the flexibility offered by this tech-based approach could serve to future-proof the business.

Kate Cracknell
[email protected]
@healthclubkate

 


CONTACT US

Leisure Media
Tel: +44 (0)1462 431385

©Cybertrek 2021

ABOUT LEISURE MEDIA
LEISURE MEDIA MAGAZINES
LEISURE MEDIA HANDBOOKS
LEISURE MEDIA WEBSITES
LEISURE MEDIA PRODUCT SEARCH
PRINT SUBSCRIPTIONS
FREE DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTIONS
 
14 Jun 2021 Leisure Management: daily news and jobs
 
 
HOME
JOBS
NEWS
FEATURES
PRODUCTS
FREE DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION
PRINT SUBSCRIPTION
ADVERTISE
CONTACT US
Sign up for FREE ezine

Features List



SELECTED ISSUE
Health Club Management
2016 issue 10

View issue contents

Leisure Management - Tech versus bricks & mortar

Editor’s letter

Tech versus bricks & mortar


With technology making it ever simpler for consumers to personalise the products they buy, operators will increasingly turn to tech rather than bricks and mortar to deliver individually curated fitness experiences

Kate Cracknell
People expect to control everything from their phones shutterstock

B usinesses don’t get to tell consumers what to buy any more. This was the stark warning from Humphrey Cobbold, CEO of Pure Gym, during the Millennial-focused panel session I moderated at Bloomberg’s e-wellness and technology conference recently.

He continued: “We have to maximise the number of options we’re offering, and then give people the flexibility to buy exactly the product they want – and none of the things they don’t. Mobile devices have put the power into the hands of the consumer.”

All around the room were nods of agreement: flexibility is one of the main boxes that businesses must tick if they want to appeal to Millennials. Indeed, new Danish health club brand Repeat (page 38), designed specifically for Millennials, has built its entire pricing model around this insight. Memberships are sold on a weekly basis – pay per visit is also available – and can be cancelled through the app with just that week plus one more week’s notice.

But this sort of flexibility doesn’t only appeal to Millennials – most customers would love to create their perfect package and then pay only for that. What better way to feel you’re getting good value?

Pure Gym has recognised this and is now investing heavily in technology to better cater for all its members, earmarking a significant proportion of the £190m it plans to generate from this month’s stock market flotation for precisely this purpose. Specifically, Cobbold says his in-house tech team will be developing systems to deliver new and distinct membership packages, “in much the same way an airline creates different price points for different seats on the same flight”.

Offering different levels of membership in itself isn’t new, but the sheer level of personalisation now possible thanks to technology means consumers expect to have a dynamic relationship with the businesses they use. They want to be in charge on a day-to-day basis, controlling things from the palm of their hand. And as Cobbold says, technology delivers this, allowing people to “make choices about how they want to use the gym – what sort of membership they want and how they want to pay for it”.

Using technology to personalise the experience allows operators to very cost-effectively experiment with marketing to the various shared-interest ‘tribes’ that exist among fitness users. As Pure Gym has already shown with its trial of premium memberships, it’s comparatively risk-free to test new ideas in a handful of locations before rolling out across the estate at the touch of a button.

This in contrast to the bricks and mortar approach we’ve seen so far; although the tribalisation of fitness has accelerated recently, it’s primarily been through the launch of Millennial-focused facilities such as CrossFit and the boutiques, all building strong tribes around their niche offerings. This approach requires significant investment, not to mention creating a long-term property liability with less flexibility to adapt to new trends.

No doubt these specialist clubs will continue to thrive, but we’re seeing the emergence of a digital alternative – a way to use technology to unbundle a full-service offering and deliver curated, personalised experiences for each and every member within one facility.

Creating points of difference won’t be as straightforward as when building a dedicated facility, because members will still be choosing from the same menu of services and facilities. But if marketed well, tribes will naturally form; additional income from new (and more satisfied) users can be invested in improvements and new services; and the flexibility offered by this tech-based approach could serve to future-proof the business.

Kate Cracknell
[email protected]
@healthclubkate


Originally published in Health Club Management 2016 issue 10

Published by Leisure Media Tel: +44 (0)1462 431385 | Contact us | About us | © Cybertrek Ltd